An adult's psychological health and sense of well-being depend to a
significant degree on the quality of his or her important relationships—that
is, on patterns of interaction with a partner and children, parents and
siblings, and friends and colleagues. Problems in the interaction between any of
these significant others can lead to clinical symptoms and impaired functioning
among one or more members of the relational unit. Relational problems may be a
focus of clinical attention (1) when a relational unit is distressed and
dysfunctional or threatened with dissolution and (2) when the relational
problems precede, accompany, or follow other psychiatric or medical disorders.
Indeed, other medical or psychiatric symptoms can be influenced by the
relational context of the patient. Conversely, the functioning of a relational
unit is affected by a member's general and other medical or psychiatric illness.
Relational disorders require a different clinical approach than other disorders.
Instead of focusing primarily on the link between symptoms, signs, and the
workings of the individual mind, the clinician must also focus on interactions
between the individuals involved and how these interactions are related to the
general and other medical or psychiatric symptoms in a meaningful
way.
Definition
According to the text revision of the fourth edition of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
(DSM-IV-TR), relational problems are patterns of interaction between members of
a relational unit that are associated with symptoms or significantly impaired
functioning in one or more individual members or with significantly impaired
functioning of the relational unit itself. DSM-IV-TR distinguishes five
categories of relational problems: (1) relational problem related to a mental or
general medical condition; (2) parent–child relational problem; (3) partner
relational problem; (4) sibling relational problem; and (5) relational problem
not otherwise specified.
Epidemiology
No reliable figures are available on the prevalence of relational
problems. They can be assumed to be ubiquitous; however, most relational
problems resolve without professional intervention. The nature, frequency, and
effects of the problem on those involved are elements that must be considered
before a diagnosis of relational problem is made. For example, divorce, which
occurs in just under 50 percent of marriages, is a problem between partners that
is resolved through the legal remedy of divorce and need not be diagnosed as a
relational problem. If the persons cannot resolve their disputation and continue
to live together in a sadomasochistic or pathologically depressed relationship
with unhappiness and abuse, then they should be so labeled. Relationship
problems between involved persons that cannot be resolved by friends, family, or
clergy require professional intervention by psychiatrists, clinical
psychologists, social workers, and other mental health
professionals.
Relational Problem Related to a Mental Disorder or General Medical
Condition
According to DSM-IV-TR, the category of relational problem related
to a mental disorder or general medical condition “should be used when the
focus of clinical attention is a pattern of impaired interaction associated with
a psychiatric disorder or a general medical condition in a family
member.â€
Studies indicate that satisfying relationships may have a
health-protective influence, whereas relationship distress tends to be
associated with an increased incidence of illness. The influence of relational
systems on health has been explained through psychophysiological mechanisms that
link the intense emotions generated in human attachment systems to vascular
reactivity and immune processes. Thus, stress-related psychological or physical
symptoms can be an expression of family dysfunction.
Adults must often assume responsibility for caring for aging
parents while they are still caring for their own children, and this dual
obligation can create stress. When adults take care of their parents, both
parties must adapt to a reversal of their former roles, and the caretakers not
only face the potential loss of their parents, but also must cope with evidence
of their own mortality.
Some caretakers abuse their aging parents—a problem that is now
receiving attention. Abuse is most likely to occur when the caretaking offspring
have substance abuse problems, are under economic stress, and have no relief
from their caretaking duties, or when the parent is bedridden or has a chronic
illness requiring constant nursing attention. More women are abused than men,
and most abuse occurs in persons over age 75.
The development of a chronic illness in a family member stresses
the family system and requires adaptation by both the sick person and the other
family members. The person who has become sick must frequently face a loss of
autonomy, an increased sense of vulnerability, and sometimes a taxing medical
regimen. The other family members must experience the loss of the person as he
or she was before the illness, and they usually have substantial caretaking
responsibility—for example, in debilitating neurological diseases, including
dementia of
the Alzheimer's type, and in diseases such as acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and cancer. In these cases, the whole family must deal with the stress of prospective death as well as the current illness. Some families use the anger engendered by such situations to create support organizations, increase public awareness of the disease, and rally around the sick member. But chronic illness frequently produces depression in family members and can cause them to withdraw from, or attack, one another. The burden of caring for ill family members falls disproportionately on the women in a family—mothers, daughters, and daughters-in-law.
P.871
the Alzheimer's type, and in diseases such as acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and cancer. In these cases, the whole family must deal with the stress of prospective death as well as the current illness. Some families use the anger engendered by such situations to create support organizations, increase public awareness of the disease, and rally around the sick member. But chronic illness frequently produces depression in family members and can cause them to withdraw from, or attack, one another. The burden of caring for ill family members falls disproportionately on the women in a family—mothers, daughters, and daughters-in-law.
Chronic emotional illness also requires major adaptations by
families. For instance, family members may react with chaos or fear to the
psychotic productions of a family member with schizophrenia. The regression,
exaggerated emotions, frequent hospitalizations, and economic and social
dependence of a person with schizophrenia can stress the family system. Family
members may react with hostile feelings (referred to as expressed emotion) that
are associated with a poor prognosis for the person who is sick. Similarly, a
family member with bipolar I disorder can disrupt a family, particularly during
manic episodes.
Family devastation can occur when illness (1) suddenly strikes a
previously healthy person, (2) occurs earlier than expected in the life cycle
(some impairment of physical capacities is expected in old age, although many
older persons are healthy), (3) affects the economic stability of the family,
and (4) when little can be done to improve or ease the condition of the sick
family member.
Parent–Child Relational Problem
Parents differ widely in sensing the needs of their infants. Some
quickly note their child's moods and needs; others are slow to respond. Parental
responsiveness interacts with the child's temperament to affect the quality of
the attachment between child and parent. According to DSM-IV-TR, the diagnosis
of parent–child relational problem applies when the focus of clinical
attention is a pattern of interaction between parent and child that is
associated with clinically significant impairment in individual or family
functioning or with clinically significant symptoms. Examples include impaired
communication, overprotection, and inadequate discipline.
Research on parenting skills has isolated two major dimensions: (1)
a permissive-restrictive dimension and (2) a warm-and-accepting versus
cold-and-hostile dimension. A typology that separates parents on these
dimensions distinguishes between authoritarian
(restrictive and cold), permissive (minimally
restrictive and accepting), and authoritative
(restrictive as needed, but also warm and accepting) parenting styles. Children
of authoritarian parents tend to be withdrawn or conflicted; those of permissive
parents are likely to be more aggressive, impulsive, and low achievers; and
children of authoritative parents seem to function at the highest level,
socially and cognitively. Yet, switching from an authoritarian to a permissive
mode may create a negative reinforcement pattern.
Difficulties in many situations stress the usual parent–child
interaction. Substantial evidence indicates that marital discord leads to
problems in children, from depression and withdrawal to conduct disorder and
poor performance at school. This negative effect may be partly mediated through
triangulation of the parent–child relationships,
which is a process in which conflicted parents attempt to win the sympathy and
support of their child, who is recruited by one parent as an ally in the
struggle with the partner. Divorces and remarriages stress the parent–child
relationship and may create painful loyalty conflicts. Stepparents often find it
difficult to assume a parental role and may resent the special relationship that
exists between their new marital partner and the children from that partner's
previous marriages. The resentment of a stepparent by a stepchild and the
favoring of a natural child are usual reactions in a new family's initial phases
of adjustment. When a second child is born, both familial stress and happiness
may result, although happiness is the dominant emotion in most families. The
birth of a child can also be troublesome when parents had adopted a child in the
belief that they were infertile. Single-parent families usually consist of a
mother and children, and their relationship is often affected by financial and
emotional problems.
Other situations that can produce a parent–child problem are the
development of fatal, crippling, or chronic illness, such as leukemia, epilepsy,
sickle-cell anemia, or spinal cord injury, in either parent or child. The birth
of a child with congenital defects, such as cerebral palsy, blindness, and
deafness, may also produce parent–child problems. These situations, which are
not rare, challenge the emotional resources of those involved. Parents and child
must face present and potential loss and must adjust their day-to-day lives
physically, economically, and emotionally. These situations can strain the
healthiest families and produce parent–child problems not only with the sick
person but also with the unaffected family members. In a family with a severely
sick child, parents may resent, prefer, or neglect the other children because
the ill child requires so much time and attention.
Parents with children who have emotional disorders face particular
problems, depending on the child's illness. In families with a child with
schizophrenia, family treatment is beneficial and improves the social adjustment
of the patient. Similarly, family therapy is useful when a child has a mood
disorder. In families with a substance-abusing child or adolescent, family
involvement is crucial to help control the drug-seeking behavior and to allow
family members to verbalize the feelings of frustration and anger that are
invariably present.
Normal developmental crises can also be related to parent–child
problems. For instance, adolescence is a time of frequent conflict, as the
adolescent resists rules and demands increasing autonomy, and, at the same time,
elicits protective control by displaying immature and dangerous behavior.
The parents of sons aged 18, 15, and 11 years presented with
distress about the behavior of their middle child. The family had been cohesive
with satisfactory relationships among all members until 6 months before this
consultation. At that time, the 15-year-old began seeing a girl from a
comparatively unsupervised household. Frequent arguments had developed between
parents and son regarding going out on school nights, curfews, and neglect of
schoolwork. The son's combativeness and lowered academic achievement upset his
parents a great deal. They had not experienced similar conflicts with their
oldest child. The adolescent, however, maintained a good relationship with his
siblings and friends, was not a behavior problem at school, continued to
participate on the school basketball team, and was not a substance
user.
P.872
Day Care Centers
Quality of care during the first 3 years of life is crucial to
neuropsychological development. A 1997 study from the National Institute of
Child Health and Human Development indicated that day care was not harmful to
children, when the caregivers and day care teachers provided consistent,
empathetic, nurturing care. Not all day care centers can meet that level of
care, however, especially those located in poor urban areas. Children receiving
less than optimal caring exhibit decreased intellectual and verbal skills that
indicate delayed neurocognitive development. They may also become irritable,
anxious, or depressed, which interferes with the parent–child bonding
experience, and they are less assertive and less effectively toilet trained by
the age of 5.
Currently, more than 55 percent of women are in the work force,
many of whom have no choice but to place their children in day care centers.
Approximately 40 percent of entering medical students are women; few medical
centers, however, make adequate provisions for on-site day care centers for
their students or staff. Similarly, corporations need to provide on-site,
high-quality care for the children of their employees. Not only will that
approach benefit the children, but also corporate economic benefits will accrue
as a result of reduced absenteeism, increased productivity, and happier working
mothers. Such programs have the added benefit of decreasing stresses on
marriages.
Partner Relational Problem
According to DSM-IV-TR, clinicians should use the category partner
relational problem when the focus of clinical attention is a pattern of
interaction between the spouses or partners. These patterns are characterized by
negative communication (e.g., criticisms), distorted communication (e.g.,
unrealistic expectations), or noncommunication (e.g., withdrawal), associated
with clinically significant impairment in individual or family functioning or
symptoms in one or both partners.
When persons have partner relational problems, psychiatrists must
assess whether a patient's distress arises from the relationship or from a
mental disorder. Mental disorders are more common in single persons—those who
never married or who are widowed, separated, or divorced—than among married
persons. Clinicians should evaluate developmental, sexual, and occupational and
relationship histories, for purposes of diagnosis. (Divorce is discussed in
Chapter 2, Section 2.4, and couples
therapy is discussed in Chapter 35, Section
35.4.)
Marriage demands a sustained level of adaptation from both
partners. In a troubled marriage, a therapist can encourage the partners to
explore areas such as the extent of communication between the partners, their
ways of solving disputes, their attitudes toward child-bearing and
child-rearing, their relationships with their in-laws, their attitudes toward
social life, their handling of finances, and their sexual interaction. The birth
of a child, an abortion or miscarriage, economic stresses, moves to new areas,
episodes of illness, major career changes, and any situations that involve a
significant change in marital roles can precipitate stressful periods in a
relationship. Illness in a child exerts the greatest strain on a marriage, and
marriages in which a child has died through illness or accident more often than
not end in divorce. Complaints of lifelong anorgasmia or impotence by marital
partners usually indicate intrapsychic problems, although sexual dissatisfaction
is involved in many cases of marital maladjustment.
Adjustment to marital roles can be a problem when partners are from
different backgrounds and have grown up with different value systems. For
example, members of low socioeconomic status groups perceive a wife as making
most of the decisions in the family, and they accept physical punishment as a
way to discipline children. Middle-class persons perceive family decision-making
processes as shared, with the husband often being the final arbiter, and they
prefer to discipline children verbally. Problems involving conflicts in values,
adjustment to new roles, and poor communication are handled most effectively
when therapist and partners examine the couple's relationship, as in marital
therapy.
Epidemiological surveys show that unhappy marriages are a risk
factor for major depressive disorder. Marital discord also affects physical
health. For example, in a study of women aged 30 to 65 years with coronary
artery disease, marital stress worsened the prognosis 2.9 times for recurrent
coronary events. Marital conflict was also associated with a 46 percent higher
relative death risk among female patients having hemodialysis, and with
elevations in serum epinephrine, norepinephrine, and corticotrophin levels in
both men and women. In one study, high levels of hostile marital behavior were
associated with slower healing of wounds, lower production of proinflammatory
cytokines, and higher cytokine production in peripheral blood. Overall, women
show greater psychological and physiological responsiveness to conflict than
men.
Physician Marriages
Physicians have a higher risk of divorce than other occupational
groups. The incidence of divorce among physicians is about 25 to 30 percent.
Specialty choice influenced divorce. The highest rate of divorce occurred in
psychiatrists (50 percent), followed by surgeons (33 percent) and internists,
pediatricians, and pathologists (31 percent). The average age at first marriage
was 26 years among all groups.
It is not clear why physicians are at high risk for divorce.
Factors implicated include the stresses of dealing with dying patients, making
life-and-death decisions, working long hours, and the constant risk of
malpractice litigation. Such stressors may predispose physicians to a variety of
emotional ills, with the most common being depression and substance abuse,
including alcoholism. Such persons generally cannot deal with the complex
interactions required to maintain successful long-term relationships of any
kind, and marriage requires the most interpersonal skills of
all.
Sibling Relational Problem
According to DSM-IV-TR, the category of sibling relational problem
“should be used when the focus of clinical attention is a pattern of
interaction between siblings, associated with clinically significant impairment
of family functioning, or symptoms in one or more of the siblings.â€
Sibling relationships tend to be characterized by competition,
comparison, and cooperation. Intense sibling rivalry can occur with the birth of
a child and can persist as the
children grow up, compete for parental approval, and measure their accomplishments against one another. Alliances between siblings are equally common. Siblings may learn to protect one another against parental control or aggression. In households with three children, one pair tends to become closely involved with one another, leaving the extra child in the position of outsider.
P.873
children grow up, compete for parental approval, and measure their accomplishments against one another. Alliances between siblings are equally common. Siblings may learn to protect one another against parental control or aggression. In households with three children, one pair tends to become closely involved with one another, leaving the extra child in the position of outsider.
Relational problems can arise when siblings are not treated
equally; for instance, when one child is being idealized, while another is cast
in the role of the family scapegoat. Differences in gender roles and
expectations expressed by the parents can underlie sibling rivalry.
Parent–child relationships also are dependent on personality interactions. A
child's resentment directed at a parental figure or a child's own disavowed dark
emotions can be projected onto a sibling and can fuel an intense hate
relationship.
A child's general, other medical or psychiatric condition always
stresses the sibling relationships. Parental concern and attention to the sick
child can elicit envy in the siblings. In addition, chronic disability can leave
the sick child feeling devalued and rejected by siblings, and the latter may
develop a sense of superiority and may feel embarrassed about having a disabled
sister or brother.
Relational Problem not Otherwise Specified
According to DSM-IV-TR, the category of relational problem not
otherwise specified “should be used when the focus of clinical attention is on
relational problems not classifiable by any of the specific problems above
(e.g., difficulties with superiors and coworkers).â€
People, across the life cycle, may become involved in relational
problems with leaders and others in their community at large. In such
relationships, conflicts are common and can bring about stress-related symptoms.
Many relational problems of children occur in the school setting and involve
peers. Impaired peer relationships can be the chief complaint in
attention-deficit or conduct disorders, as well as in depressive and other
psychiatric disorders of childhood, adolescence, and adulthood.
Racial, ethnic, and religious prejudices and ignorance cause
problems in interpersonal relationships. In the workplace and in communities at
large, sexual harassment is often a combination of inappropriate sexual
interactions, inappropriate displays of abuse of power and dominance, and
expressions of negative gender stereotypes, primarily toward women and gay men,
although also toward children and adolescents of both sexes.
References
Bernstein AC. Gender in stepfamilies: Daughters and fathers. In:
Silverstein LB, Goodrich TJ, eds. Feminist Family Therapy:
Empowerment in Social Context. Washington, DC: American Psychological
Association; 2003.
Dickstein LJ. Relational problems. In: Sadock BJ, Sadock VA, eds.
Kaplan & Sadock's Comprehensive Textbook of
Psychiatry. 8th ed. Vol. 2. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;
2005:2241.
Drescher J, D'Ercole A, Schoenberg E, eds. Psychotherapy with Gay Men and Lesbians: Contemporary Dynamic
Approaches. Binghampton, NY: The Harrington Park Press/The Haworth Press,
Inc.; 2003.
Edward J. The loving side of the sibling bond: A force
for growth or conflict. Issues in Psychoanalysis and
Psychology. 2003;25:27–43.
Kirkpatrick DC, Duck S, Foley MK, eds. Relating
Difficulty: The Processes of Constructing and Managing Difficult
Interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers;
2006.
Lasenza S. Sexuality: Psychoanalytic perspectives.
J Sex Marital Ther.
2004;30:53–56.
Looy HA. Gender and sexuality: Constancy and change. In: Vander Stoep
SW, ed. Science and the Soul: Christian Faith and
Psychological Research. Lantham, MD: University Press of America, Inc.;
2003.
Morrongiello BA, Hogg K. Mothers' reactions to
children misbehaving in ways that can lead to injury: Implications for gender
differences in children's risk taking and injuries. Sex
Roles. 2004;50:103–118.
Nemeroff CB. Neurobiological consequences of childhood trauma. J Clin Psychiatry. 2004;65[Suppl 1]:18–28.
Riley S. Art therapy with couples. In: Malchiodi CA, ed. Handbook of Art Therapy. New York: Guilford Press;
2003.
Sanford K. Expectancies and communication behavior in
marriage: Distinguishing proximal level effects from distal level effects. Journal of Social and Personal
Relationships.2003;20:391–402.
Sholerane G, Pirooz MD, eds with LD Schwoer. Textbook of Family and Couples Therapy: Clinical
Applications. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, Inc.;
2003.
Stern DN. The motherhood constellation: Therapeutic approaches to
early relational problems. In: Sameroff AJ, McDonough SC, Rosenalum KL, eds.
Treating Parent–Infant Relationship Problems: Strategies
for Intervention. New York: Guilford Press; 2004:29-42.
Vandervoort D, Rokach A. Posttraumatic relationship
syndrome: The conscious processing of the world of trauma. Social Behavior and Personality.
2003;31:675–686.
Walzer S, Oles TP. Managing conflict after marriages
end: A qualitative study of narratives of ex-spouses. Families in Society.
2003;84:192–200.
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar